A rather odd response to the Chancellors Autumn Statement

The Elephant in the room . . . .  (Sea)

Slimpe flimg hoveling bing balley how fly crospa thing in the pink floo go zolos big hist chip pooly gharna fly kjdfzlakjaf n nf adsapwru akdjk j spoly adfhfj sjfh sfj os0riwue.  I urii uq0 q08wqrt-ty9  dksfjf polly nad hoosker trip fol ajdkad adjka jkds ad kjdkjdk a-wer  ksjfdksfj sjf sfkj  pgdh pkk n mn sfnmasdb nka n b bandkrj  ad b and then fkskf chanceling rubbish a ncvmvmvn sa gobbledy gook.

 jhaverhd h aoud mini asdj  statement fsdhjfhj hh finances and   sjflj tax sjl  as well as a right old load of zcxvbxvcbv about balances bookes on his head. Anyway that joalster armie flea splat Mr Osborne babbled on for at lefxcbnvb an hour I reckon and although I (cxcvbsddi) sort of listened and blustied about in the waine a bit. I think it was not right.

Which brings me to my nest point ffhrrrjhjhfk and stuff is all very well, but I mean it fhjsjfghhf feste seems to get harder to understand kfjskfjlsisurif hisiltol glue stool pop d djskasd each year. At least in the olds days he put a couple of pence on a bottle of wine, everyone complained and blunstile approllist adsfsrfdsgf and we would throw seagulls at him. But not now . . . . now you need to have a degree in finance to even understand what he is saying. Which is of course the plan, because if you did know what the Chancellor of the Exchequer was on about then you would also know all is not what it seems.  And he has pinched your money again

I mean just how can anyone complain when they don’t understand a word of it, well not the bits where he nicks your money back anyway. . . . .  So all I can say in response to our old mate Mr George Osborne is . . . . Scrimble flip boo kistal jim spol greb askfjlk and I hope it hurts too.

Drugs in Sport is one thing but drugs in politics is terrible. . . . . I demand tests on the lot ( NO not tests on the drugs but test on politicians).

OOOOOoooo look a seagull.

Damn this is harder than it loops . . . PHEW